Zenism
Introduction:
Here I've written a small paper on my ideology "Zenism" a movement created in reaction to "Normism"(normality being no.1)
What's wrong with current society
In nationalsocialism, scientist, engineers, state-workers did whatever they wanted with the mass.
That was wrong, it was eventually fixed.
In individualsocialism, the mass has started doing whatever they want with weirdos.
that is wrong, I expect that to also get fixed.
I expect citizenism with protestant values to replace normism7catholicism.
The normies will be defeat by people simply being responsible citizens.
Ideology Rundown
AGNO-CAP/NATSOC 1:
agnostic capitalism/nationalsocialism 1
* the social protocol of the late 1800s/early 1900s
* White with aspergers/autism men, doctors, state workers, engineers treat women and minorities like their slaves, exempt from law
* died around 1945, replaced by CAT-CAP
CAT-CAP:
catholic capitalism
* equal before law
* equally judged for teachers complex
* losers are criminals and people with asperger
CAT-CAP 1.5:
* people with aspergers are judged less for teachers complex
PRO/AGNO/Zenism-CAP 2:
* Equal before law
* Authenticity and productivity is focus.
* People with aspergers are judged less for their display of teachers complex
* Criminals are judged less and given more opportunities to work through different systems.
* Money-oriented
IND-SOC:
* basic rights, food, shelter
* no reproduction on welfare
* SMV-oriented
COM:
* State plans
* SMV-oriented
* Work-camps
You can combine IND-SOC and PRO-CAP/CAT-CAP
Zenism Rules
* Participate in CPSC-breeding, compete in respecting womens feelings/following sociocultural rules.
* Participate in bidirectional, breeding, INTs, EMPs, just be, but be aware it is a bit chaotic.
That's the base, then if you are doing cat-cap, pro-cap, or communism above that is whatever.
Values
What normism and zenism has in common is they are both based around the idea of a sexual market where the individual is a product.
Buth they have different ideas of how individuals are to be judged.
Normists think that individuals are supposed to compete in adhering to sociocultural norms.
This is setup according to the CPSC-model:
Women: casting presses, judges men for their ability to follow sociocultural norms. like cats
Men: Plastic, judged by women for their ability to follow sociocultural norms. like dogs
It is the optimal setup when people just follow squarish sets of rules.
But when you don't follow squarish sets of rules this isn't the ideal setup.
When doing science and creativity you want to tilt the balance a bit more towards creativity rather than rules.
Those with aspergers focus on science/creativity while those that don't have aspergers acts as assistans to those with asperger.
so:
Aspergers, "cats": casting presses, judges those with CPSC for their ability to be of assistance
CPSC, "dogs": plastic, judged for their ability to be of assistance to those with asperger.
This was how it worked in the early 1900s mostly, albeit very anti-women.
science and creativity wasn't a womens job they thought back then.
That stopped because endlessly respecting scientist became seen as immoral, and destructive.
That was basically what nazism was about, the supremacy of science men above all.
Zenism preaches balance between scientist and non-scientist instead.
Normist don't like people with asperger because they are spatially unmindful, but they are so to be maximally creative.
For a person to be considered a *true* zenist they must possess non-regressive bidirectional neurology.
They must not put themselves below the normist.
Or rather one should put themselves besides the normies.
As long as the normist aren't agressive they are to be left alone.
PROBLEMS WITH NORMISM
* Aspergerphobic(doesn't work for people with asperger, which we want in our society)
* Doesn't work for people who lack teachers complex(so people with asperger syndrome)
teachers complex = taking responsibility misperceptions/perceptions
* doesn't work for people who lack impulse control and sometimes breaks laws.
basically doesn't work for people who are a lot, but not too much.
* also people who are "too much"(too reckless), like Breivik, should have greater access to academia, of course still decently separated.
* remember a person "as much"(as reckless) as Werner von Braun operated as head of NASA.
Not that a person of such recklessness should have access to the public, but they should still have access to material to be able to academically/creatively contribute to society.
ZENIST SMV
In Zenism people are ranked either for their:
* creativity, intellect, asperger => makes you a useful "Cat"
AND/OR
* inhibition, sociocultural obedience, social skills => makes you a useful "Dog"
Most people are a bit of both, being highly leaning in one direction is rare.
Low SMV in Zenism is caused by malign CPSC, basically strict adherence to sociocultural rules.
Relevant Political Ideologies
* Zenism
* Social-individualism
* Protestant capitalism
* catholic capitalism
ZENISM
* Post eye-for-eye/teachers-complex rehab/productivity systems:
..* village-separation system, tiers of post-eye-for-eye/teachers-complex.
* asperger-positive society
* Authenticity & productivity
Development of ideal individuals
early 1900s natsoc ideals:
Women respect men, scientist act lawlessly.
economically optimized.
but human-rights wise completely rubbish.
and long-term stability wise rubbish.
mid 1900s NWO:
equal human rights
Individualism
Women judge men for their ability to follow sociocultural rules, laws
very non-destructive, but too anti-masculine.
2020s ZWO:
Equal rights
Individualism
people with asperger judge those with CPSC.
live in parallell with the normist.
In Nazism scientist ruled over the normists.
In normism, science people were seen as weirdos that shouldn't reproduce, you choose between being a family man or a science man
In Zenism scientist and normists live in parallell.